Revision 10430
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza over 11 years ago
map.csv | ||
---|---|---|
31 | 31 |
dwc_dwcore_Sex,sex,, |
32 | 32 |
dwc_curatorial_IdentifiedBy,identifiedBy,, |
33 | 33 |
dwc_curatorial_CollectorNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/3, |
34 |
dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
35 |
----- |
|
36 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
37 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
38 |
-----" |
|
34 |
dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
39 | 35 |
dwc_curatorial_TypeStatus,typeStatus,, |
40 | 36 |
dwc_curatorial_IndividualCount,individualCount,, |
41 | 37 |
dwc_geospatial_DecimalLatitude,decimalLatitude,, |
... | ... | |
64 | 60 |
dwc_terms_year,yearCollected,, |
65 | 61 |
dwc_terms_month,monthCollected,, |
66 | 62 |
dwc_terms_day,dayCollected,, |
67 |
dwc_terms_fieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
68 |
----- |
|
69 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
70 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
71 |
-----" |
|
63 |
dwc_terms_fieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
72 | 64 |
dwc_terms_continent,continent,, |
73 | 65 |
dwc_terms_country,country,, |
74 | 66 |
dwc_terms_stateProvince,stateProvince,, |
... | ... | |
114 | 106 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_DayIdentified,dayIdentified,, |
115 | 107 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_TypeStatus,typeStatus,, |
116 | 108 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_CollectorNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/3, |
117 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
118 |
----- |
|
119 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
120 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
121 |
-----" |
|
109 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
122 | 110 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_Collector,recordedBy,, |
123 | 111 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_YearCollected,yearCollected,, |
124 | 112 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_MonthCollected,monthCollected,, |
Also available in: Unified diff
correction: inputs/SpeciesLink/Specimen/map.csv: FieldNumber: fixed incorrect comment that these fields are identical to recordNumber, when instead they have the same *meaning but not the same values. instead, values are stored under either of the two terms. the previous conclusion had been based on an incorrect query, which used != instead of the NULL-sensitive IS NOT DISTINCT FROM.