Revision 10430
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza over 11 years ago
new_terms.csv | ||
---|---|---|
28 | 28 |
dwc_dwcore_Sex,sex,, |
29 | 29 |
dwc_curatorial_IdentifiedBy,identifiedBy,, |
30 | 30 |
dwc_curatorial_CollectorNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/3, |
31 |
dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
32 |
----- |
|
33 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
34 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
35 |
-----" |
|
31 |
dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
36 | 32 |
dwc_curatorial_TypeStatus,typeStatus,, |
37 | 33 |
dwc_curatorial_IndividualCount,individualCount,, |
38 | 34 |
dwc_geospatial_DecimalLatitude,decimalLatitude,, |
... | ... | |
59 | 55 |
dwc_terms_year,yearCollected,, |
60 | 56 |
dwc_terms_month,monthCollected,, |
61 | 57 |
dwc_terms_day,dayCollected,, |
62 |
dwc_terms_fieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
63 |
----- |
|
64 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
65 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
66 |
-----" |
|
58 |
dwc_terms_fieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
67 | 59 |
dwc_terms_continent,continent,, |
68 | 60 |
dwc_terms_country,country,, |
69 | 61 |
dwc_terms_stateProvince,stateProvince,, |
... | ... | |
109 | 101 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_DayIdentified,dayIdentified,, |
110 | 102 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_TypeStatus,typeStatus,, |
111 | 103 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_CollectorNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/3, |
112 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
113 |
----- |
|
114 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
115 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
116 |
-----" |
|
104 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber,collectorNumber,/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field instead means the same thing as recordNumber, and values are stored under either of the two terms." |
|
117 | 105 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_Collector,recordedBy,, |
118 | 106 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_YearCollected,yearCollected,, |
119 | 107 |
conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_MonthCollected,monthCollected,, |
Also available in: Unified diff
correction: inputs/SpeciesLink/Specimen/map.csv: FieldNumber: fixed incorrect comment that these fields are identical to recordNumber, when instead they have the same *meaning but not the same values. instead, values are stored under either of the two terms. the previous conclusion had been based on an incorrect query, which used != instead of the NULL-sensitive IS NOT DISTINCT FROM.