Project

General

Profile

« Previous | Next » 

Revision 1226

Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza almost 13 years ago

SALVIAS inputs: Use new _units:[units="%"] on soil fields that are percents. Replace "<..." values with 0.

View differences:

VegX.plots.csv
29 29 
"bearing",,
30 30 
"slope_aspect","/*UniqueIdentifierID->/*s/plot/slopeAspect",
31 31 
"slope_gradient","/*UniqueIdentifierID->/*s/plot/slopeGradient",
32 
"clay_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=clayPercent]/value",
33 
"silt_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=siltPercent]/value",
34 
"sand_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=sandPercent]/value",
32 
"clay_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=clayPercent]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
33 
"silt_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=siltPercent]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
34 
"sand_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=sandPercent]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
35 35 
"pH","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/ph","Brad: For all these soil variables, how do we store information on method, units. Seems like an ontological structure would be more appropriate (measurementName, measurementValue, measurementUnits, measurementMethod). Same as BIEN traits table. Something to discuss."
36 
"soil_N","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/nitrogen",
37 
"soil_P","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/phosphorus",
38 
"soil_C","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=carbon]/value",
39 
"soil_K","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/pottasium",
40 
"soil_Mg","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/magnesium",
41 
"soil_Ca","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=calcium]/value",
42 
"soil_Na","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=sodium]/value",
43 
"soil_acidity","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=acidity]/value",
44 
"soil_base","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=base]/value",
36 
"soil_N","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/nitrogen/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
37 
"soil_P","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/phosphorus/_map:[""<1,5""=0]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
38 
"soil_C","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=carbon]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
39 
"soil_K","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/pottasium/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
40 
"soil_Mg","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/magnesium/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
41 
"soil_Ca","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=calcium]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
42 
"soil_Na","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=sodium]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
43 
"soil_acidity","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=acidity]/value/_map:[""<0.05""=0]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
44 
"soil_base","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=base]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
45 45 
"soil_cation_cap","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=cationCap]/value",
46 46 
"soil_conductivity","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=conductivity]/value",
47 
"organic_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=organicPercent]/value",
48 
"soil_texture","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=texture]/value",
47 
"organic_percent","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=organicPercent]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
48 
"soil_texture","->/*s/abioticObservation[*ID]/simpleUserdefined[name=texture]/value/_units:[units=""%""]/value",
49 49 
"RevisionComments",,
50 50 
"Locality_Description","/*UniqueIdentifierID->/*s/plot/simpleUserdefined[name=localityDescription]/value","Brad: No; this is free text description of locality where plot was situated, same as for DwC. Not a description of vegetation. Most likely='namedPlace.placeDescription' in VB; not sure about VX, again need to ask Nick where locality descriptions live in VX"
51 51 
"topography_desc",,

Also available in: Unified diff