Revision 4080
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza about 12 years ago
DwC.specimens.full.csv | ||
---|---|---|
17 | 17 |
DecimalLatitude,DecimalLatitude |
18 | 18 |
DecimalLongitude,DecimalLongitude |
19 | 19 |
Family,Family |
20 |
FieldNumber,FieldNumber |
|
21 | 20 |
Genus,Genus |
22 | 21 |
GlobalUniqueIdentifier,GlobalUniqueIdentifier |
23 | 22 |
IdentifiedBy,IdentifiedBy |
... | ... | |
79 | 78 |
endDayOfYear,endDayOfYear |
80 | 79 |
eventTime,eventTime |
81 | 80 |
family,family |
82 |
fieldNumber,fieldNumber |
|
83 | 81 |
genus,genus |
84 | 82 |
identifiedBy,identifiedBy |
85 | 83 |
individualCount,individualCount |
... | ... | |
97 | 95 |
otherCatalogNumbers,otherCatalogNumbers |
98 | 96 |
phylum,phylum |
99 | 97 |
preparations,preparations |
100 |
recordNumber,recordNumber |
|
98 |
recordNumber,recordNumber/_alt/1,`union` would otherwise remove this input name because it's been mapped to (renamed) above |
|
99 |
FieldNumber,recordNumber/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
100 |
----- |
|
101 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
102 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
103 |
-----" |
|
104 |
fieldNumber,recordNumber/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec) |
|
105 |
----- |
|
106 |
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens |
|
107 |
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber"" |
|
108 |
-----" |
|
101 | 109 |
recordedBy,recordedBy |
102 | 110 |
scientificName,scientificName |
103 | 111 |
scientificNameAuthorship,scientificNameAuthorship |
Also available in: Unified diff
inputs/SpeciesLink/maps/DwC.specimens.csv: Remapped fieldNumber to recordNumber because term usage was inconsistent with DwC definition. Datasources often confuse this term, because it seems like the collection number, but is actually the author code for the event (VegBank's authorObsCode).