Project

General

Profile

« Previous | Next » 

Revision 4630

inputs/SpeciesLink/Specimen/map.csv: Removed no longer needed duplicate entries for each first letter case, which cause duplicate output mappings now that join is case- and punctuation-insensitive. Note that the `svn diff` hides _alt entry 0, which contains one of the removed duplicate columns that appears in the diff.

View differences:

VegBIEN.csv
39 39
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens
40 40
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber""
41 41
-----"
42
fieldNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/collectionnumber/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec)
43
-----
44
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens
45
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber""
46
-----"
47 42
CollectorNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/collectionnumber/_alt/3,
48 43
sex,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=plantobservation,userdefinedname=sex]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue","Brad: OMIT. Apparently not used by this institution and of uncertain applicability to plants. With other collections, *sometimes* used for phenological information (if specimen in flower, in fruit, sterile, etc.). If so, this is important information we should keep. Bob, Nick, anywhere for phenological information in VB and VX?; Aaron: Keeping it because it's useful for some collections"
49 44
catalogNumber,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/specimenreplicate/catalognumber_dwc/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/else",
......
57 52
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens
58 53
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber""
59 54
-----"
60
fieldNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_alt/1/_alt/2,"Usage inconsistent with DwC definition. This field is instead identical to recordNumber, as the following query returns zero: (takes 23 sec)
61
-----
62
SELECT count(*) FROM ""SpeciesLink"".specimens
63
WHERE COALESCE(""dwc_curatorial_FieldNumber"", ""dwc_terms_fieldNumber"", ""conceptual_darwin_2003_1_0_FieldNumber"") != ""dwc_terms_recordNumber""
64
-----"
65 55
CollectorNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_alt/1/_alt/3,
66 56
scientificName,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_alt/2/_alt/2,
67 57
identifiedBy,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/party/givenname/_namePart/first,

Also available in: Unified diff