eventDate,/location/locationevent/obsstartdate/_alt/2/_dateRangeStart/value,

dateIdentified,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/_if[@name=""if has accepted name""]/then/taxondetermination:[determinationtype=accepted]/determinationdate/_alt/1/_dateRangeStart/value",

identificationQualifier,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/_if[@name=""if has accepted name""]/then/taxondetermination:[determinationtype=accepted]/taxonfit",

recordNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/authorplantcode/_first/2,

sex,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=plantobservation,userdefinedname=sex]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue","Brad: OMIT. Apparently not used by this institution and of uncertain applicability to plants. With other collections, *sometimes* used for phenological information (if specimen in flower, in fruit, sterile, etc.). If so, this is important information we should keep. Bob, Nick, anywhere for phenological information in VB and VX?; Aaron: Keeping it because it's useful for some collections"

reproductiveCondition,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/reproductivecondition,

language,,** No join mapping for language ** 

municipality,,** No join mapping for municipality ** 

nomenclaturalCode,,** No join mapping for nomenclaturalCode ** 

otherCatalogNumbers,,** No join mapping for otherCatalogNumbers ** 

ownerInstitutionCode,,** No join mapping for specimenOwner ** 

previousIdentifications,,** No join mapping for previousIdentifications **