Revision 1019
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza almost 13 years ago
| VegX.organisms.csv | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
"SALVIAS:plotObservations","VegX:/*s/individualOrganismObservation","Comments" |
| 2 |
"PlotObsID","/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*sID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept/voucher","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later." |
|
| 3 |
"PlotID","/*ID->/*s/plotObservation/simpleUserdefined[name=authorCode]/value","Brad: Not sure why this is repeated? This field and plotCode, as the same as above." |
|
| 2 |
"PlotObsID","/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*sID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept:[partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/organizationName=$/_ignore/inLabel]/voucher","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."
|
|
| 3 |
"PlotID","/*ID->/*s/plotObservation:[partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/organizationName=$/_ignore/inLabel]/simpleUserdefined[name=authorCode]/value","Brad: Not sure why this is repeated? This field and plotCode, as the same as above."
|
|
| 4 | 4 |
"PlotCode",,"Brad: Same as plotCode, above" |
| 5 | 5 |
"census_no","/simpleUserdefined[name=censusNo]/value","Brad: Assigned by SALVIAS. 1 for first plot, then 2, 3, etc. I can't recall if we even have repeat censuses in SALVIAS. Probably not." |
| 6 | 6 |
"census_date","/simpleUserdefined[name=collectionDate]/value/_*/date", |
| ... | ... | |
| 15 | 15 |
"dist",, |
| 16 | 16 |
"perp_dist",, |
| 17 | 17 |
"SourceVoucher",,"Brad: OMIT. This is the verbatim text, which includes both collectors name and collection number. I would use coll_number, below." |
| 18 |
"coll_number","/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*sID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept/authorCode","Brad: Incorrect. Map instead as for voucher_string" |
|
| 18 |
"coll_number","/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*sID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept:[partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/organizationName=$/_ignore/inLabel]/authorCode","Brad: Incorrect. Map instead as for voucher_string"
|
|
| 19 | 19 |
"collector_code",,"Brad: OMIT" |
| 20 | 20 |
"coll_inits",, |
| 21 | 21 |
"coll_lastname","/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*sID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=collector]/partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/individualName/surName","Brad: Correct for VegBank. This is the collector of a separate specimen which vouchers this tree or species. I worry that vouchers are not properly accommodated in VegX. Again, we need to check with Nick." |
Also available in: Unified diff
VegX-VegBIEN mapping: Include the datasource name (now provided by map in /_ignore/inLabel) in the appropriate places in both VegX and VegBIEN