subplot,"/location/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/cond/_exists",

plot_code,"/location/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/else/authorlocationcode/_first/1",

det_type,"/location/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/else/authorlocationcode/_first/3/_if[@name=""if plot""]/else/_alt/2/_if[@name=""if catalogNumber""]/then/_join/3/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/cond/_eq:[right=indirect]/left","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider  asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen."

PLOT_ID,"/location/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/else/sourceaccessioncode",

plot_code,"/location/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/then/parent_id/location/authorlocationcode",

subplot,/location/authorlocationcode,

OBSERVATION_ID,"/location/iscultivated/_or/1/_if[@name=""if TaxonOccurrence""]/cond/_exists","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."

coll_number,"/location/iscultivated/_or/1/_if[@name=""if TaxonOccurrence""]/cond/_exists/_alt/1",Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

subplot,"/location/locationevent/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/cond/_exists",

census_date,"/location/locationevent/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/then/_if[@name=""if has event""]/cond/_exists","This is for the subplot, not the organism, as all organisms in a subplot have the same value for it. The following query returns no rows:

subplot,"/location/locationevent/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/then/_if[@name=""if has event""]/then/parent_id/locationevent/*_id/location/authorlocationcode/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/cond/_first/2",

census_date,"/location/locationevent/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/then/_if[@name=""if has event""]/then/parent_id/locationevent/obsenddate/_alt/2/_dateRangeEnd/value","This is for the subplot, not the organism, as all organisms in a subplot have the same value for it. The following query returns no rows:

-----

census_date,"/location/locationevent/_if[@name=""if subplot""]/then/_if[@name=""if has event""]/then/parent_id/locationevent/obsstartdate/_alt/2/_dateRangeStart/value","This is for the subplot, not the organism, as all organisms in a subplot have the same value for it. The following query returns no rows:

-----

census_date,/location/locationevent/obsenddate/_alt/2/_dateRangeEnd/value,"This is for the subplot, not the organism, as all organisms in a subplot have the same value for it. The following query returns no rows:

-----

-----"

census_date,/location/locationevent/obsstartdate/_alt/2/_dateRangeStart/value,"This is for the subplot, not the organism, as all organisms in a subplot have the same value for it. The following query returns no rows:

-----

-----"

cf_aff,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/_if[@name=""if has accepted name""]/then/taxondetermination:[determinationtype=accepted]/taxonfit","Brad: Not sure where this goes. Indicator of identification uncertainty. 'cf.'=similar to the species listed, 'aff.'=related to the species list, but not the same. You'll need to check with Bob and with Nick where these go in VegX and VegBank."

no_of_individuals,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/count,"Brad: This is a count of number of indiiduals for an *aggregate* observation. For VegBank, I'm not sure. Not exactly the same as stemCount. An individual tree could have 3 stems but would still only count as 1. We need to check with Bob on this."

cover_percent,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/cover_fraction/_percent_to_fraction/value,

census_no,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=aggregateoccurrence,userdefinedname=censusNo]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue","Brad: Assigned by SALVIAS. 1 for first plot, then 2, 3, etc. I can't recall if we even have repeat censuses in SALVIAS. Probably not."

intercept_cm,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/linecover_m/_cm_to_m/value,"Brad: This is an aggregate observation. Used in line-intercept methodology only, describes the point along centerline at which an individual intercepts the center line of the plot. Used to determin relative abundance."

individual_code,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/authorplantcode/_first/1,"Brad: Code, if any, used by the data provider to indicate an individual tree. Scope is unknown, although typically this value is unique only within plot, or sometimes only within subplot."

coll_number,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/authorplantcode/_first/2/_alt/1,Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

OBSERVATION_ID,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/sourceaccessioncode/_first/2,"Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."

det_type,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/specimenreplicate/catalognumber_dwc/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/cond/_eq:[right=indirect]/left","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider  asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen."

det_type,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/specimenreplicate/collectionnumber/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/cond/_eq:[right=indirect]/left","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider  asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen."

coll_number,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/specimenreplicate/collectionnumber/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/else/_alt/1",Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

basal_diam,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/basaldiameter_m/_cm_to_m/value,Assuming units are the same as for stem_dbh because the values are similar and they measure the same dimension

stem_canopy_form,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=stemobservation,userdefinedname=canopyForm]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue",

notes,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=stemobservation,userdefinedname=notes]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue",

stem_dbh,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/diameterbreastheight_m/_cm_to_m/value,"Assuming units based on the units for intercept_cm, which measures the same dimension"

stem_height_m,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/height_m/_alt/1,"""Total height of this stem only, in meters"" (stem_height_m definition at < http://salvias.net/Documents/salvias_data_dictionary.html#Plot+data>). Brad: Same as for height, but applies to individuals stems, not trees. Rare."

height_m,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/height_m/_alt/2,"""Total height of individual, in meters"" (height_m definition at <http://salvias.net/Documents/salvias_data_dictionary.html#Plot+data>)"

ht_first_branch_m,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/heightfirstbranch_m,

stem_tag2,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/tag/_alt/1/_alt/1,The second tag supercedes the first. The stem tag supercedes the tree tag. Brad: see above

x_position,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/stemobservation/xposition_m,"""x coordinate in meters"" (x_position definition at <http://salvias.net/Documents/salvias_data_dictionary.html#Plot+data>). Brad: These are important, fundamental values of many tree plots"

PLOT_ID,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_if[@name=""if in plot""]/cond/_exists",

OBSERVATION_ID,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_if[@name=""if in plot""]/then/_first/1/_if[@name=""if individual""]/cond/_exists","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."

individual_code,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_if[@name=""if in plot""]/then/_first/2/_first/1","Brad: Code, if any, used by the data provider to indicate an individual tree. Scope is unknown, although typically this value is unique only within plot, or sometimes only within subplot."

stem_tag2,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_if[@name=""if in plot""]/then/_first/2/_first/2/_alt/1/_alt/1",The second tag supercedes the first. The stem tag supercedes the tree tag. Brad: see above

coll_number,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/authortaxoncode/_if[@name=""if in plot""]/then/_first/2/_first/3/_alt/1",Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

coll_firstname,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/collector_id/party/fullname/_join_words/1,Brad: See comment above

habit,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/growthform/_map:[./{T,Arbol,palm}=tree,./{H,""Hemiepífito""}=hemiepiphyte,./{L,l,""L?"",Liana}=liana,E=epiphyte,S=shrub,Hb=herb,""vine-herbaceous""=vine,graminoid=grass,rosette=forb,*=*]/value","Brad: This is growth form (tree, shrub, herb, etc.). It is an observation of a trait."

OBSERVATION_ID,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/iscultivated/_alt/1/_if[@name=""if TaxonOccurrence""]/cond/_exists","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."

coll_number,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/iscultivated/_alt/1/_if[@name=""if TaxonOccurrence""]/cond/_exists/_alt/1",Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

OBSERVATION_ID,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/sourceaccessioncode/_first/2/_if[@name=""if organism in AggregateOccurrence""]/else/_first/2","Brad: Neither is correct; this is just an internal ID for table plotObservations. However, it has the important property of uniquely identifying an ""observation"", which is an individual tree, in the case of an individual observation, or a records of a species with an associated count of individuals or measurement of percent cover, in the case of aggregate observations. Not sure where to store this. Main point is that it is not part of the original data, but an auto_increment added later."

infra_rank_1,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/*_id/taxonlabel/parent_id/taxonlabel/_if[@name=""if has explicit parent""]/else/rank",

infra_rank_1,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/*_id/taxonlabel/taxonepithet/_if[@name=""if taxonomic name is epithet""]/cond/_alt:[2=true]/1/_taxonomic_name_is_epithet/rank",

family,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/*_id/taxonlabel/taxonomicname/_merge_prefix/prefix/_taxon_family_require_std/family,

genus,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/*_id/taxonlabel/taxonomicname/_merge_prefix/value/_alt/2/_join_words/1/_alt/2/_join_words/2/_filter_genus/value,

specific_epithet,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/*_id/taxonlabel/taxonomicname/_merge_prefix/value/_alt/2/_join_words/1/_alt/2/_join_words/3/_join_words/1,

specific_authority,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/author,Brad: This is the author of the scientificName.

specific_epithet,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/specific_epithet,

infra_rank_1,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/*_id/taxonverbatim/verbatimrank,

cf_aff,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[!isoriginal]/taxonfit,"Brad: Not sure where this goes. Indicator of identification uncertainty. 'cf.'=similar to the species listed, 'aff.'=related to the species list, but not the same. You'll need to check with Bob and with Nick where these go in VegX and VegBank."

orig_family,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[isoriginal=true]/*_id/taxonverbatim/family,Brad: OMIT

orig_species,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/taxondetermination[isoriginal=true]/*_id/taxonverbatim/specific_epithet,Brad: OMIT

det_type,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/voucher/*_id/specimenreplicate/catalognumber_dwc/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/cond/_eq:[right=indirect]/left","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider  asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen."

det_type,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/voucher/*_id/specimenreplicate/collectionnumber/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/cond/_eq:[right=indirect]/left","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider  asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen."

coll_number,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/voucher/*_id/specimenreplicate/collectionnumber/_if[@name=""if indirect voucher""]/then/_alt/1",Brad: Map instead as for voucher_string

PLOT_ID,"/location/sourceaccessioncode/_first/2/_if[@name=""if locationID""]/cond/_exists",

collector_code,,** No join mapping for *collector_code ** Brad: OMIT

row_num,,** No join mapping for *row_num **

species_status,,"** No join mapping for *species_status ** Brad: OMIT. Except, note that if species_status=3, this indicate that name is a morphospecies and not a standard latin name. Not exactly sure how to use this in BIEN, but could be useful during the name-scrubbing process with TNRS."