Revision 14402
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza over 10 years ago
trunk/web/links/index.htm | ||
---|---|---|
242 | 242 |
<DD>page's self-description: Technical specifications for the MacBook Pro "Core 2 Duo" 2.2 15" (SR). Dates sold, processor type, memory info, hard drive details, price and more. |
243 | 243 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac-core-i5-2.8-27-inch-aluminum-mid-2010-specs.html" name="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac-core-i5-2.8-27-inch-aluminum-mid-2010-specs.html" ADD_DATE="1406856071" ICON_URI="http://www.everymac.com/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="windows-1252"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.everymac.com/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>iMac "Core i5" 2.8 27-Inch (Mid-2010) Specs (Mid-2010, MC511LL/A, iMac11,3, A1312, 2390) @ EveryMac.com</A><a name="iMac "Core i5" 2.8 27-Inch (Mid-2010) Specs (Mid-2010, MC511LL/A, iMac11,3, A1312, 2390) @ EveryMac.com" href="#iMac "Core i5" 2.8 27-Inch (Mid-2010) Specs (Mid-2010, MC511LL/A, iMac11,3, A1312, 2390) @ EveryMac.com" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
244 | 244 |
<DD>page's self-description: Technical specifications for the iMac "Core i5" 2.8 27-Inch (Mid-2010). Dates sold, processor type, memory info, hard drive details, price and more. |
245 |
<DT><a name="Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4" href="#Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4"><H3 ADD_DATE="1373802092">Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4</H3></a> |
|
246 |
<DD>From experience, the 27-inch iMac's "2.66 GHz Intel Core i5" (System Information.app) is much faster than vegbiendev's 2.44 GHz "AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core" (/proc/cpuinfo). |
|
247 |
</DD> |
|
248 |
<DL><p> |
|
249 |
<DT><A HREF="http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-vs-AMD-Phenom-X4-9550" name="http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-vs-AMD-Phenom-X4-9550" ADD_DATE="1373801697" ICON_URI="http://cpuboss.com/images/cpuboss/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://cpuboss.com/images/cpuboss/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550</A><a name="Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550" href="#Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
250 |
<DD>page's self-description: We put the 3.4 GHz 3570K to the test against the older 2.2 GHz 9550 to find out which you should buy, the Intel or the AMD. |
|
251 |
|
|
252 |
"CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570K based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking." |
|
253 |
</DL><p> |
|
245 | 254 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-i7-2.6-15-mid-2012-retina-display-specs.html" name="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-i7-2.6-15-mid-2012-retina-display-specs.html" ADD_DATE="1406856463" ICON_URI="http://www.everymac.com/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="windows-1252"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.everymac.com/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>MacBook Pro "Core i7" 2.6 15" Retina 2012 Specs (Retina Mid-2012, MC976LL/A, MacBookPro10,1, A1398, 2512) @ EveryMac.com</A><a name="MacBook Pro "Core i7" 2.6 15" Retina 2012 Specs (Retina Mid-2012, MC976LL/A, MacBookPro10,1, A1398, 2512) @ EveryMac.com" href="#MacBook Pro "Core i7" 2.6 15" Retina 2012 Specs (Retina Mid-2012, MC976LL/A, MacBookPro10,1, A1398, 2512) @ EveryMac.com" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
246 | 255 |
<DD>page's self-description: Technical specifications for the MacBook Pro "Core i7" 2.6 15" Retina 2012. Dates sold, processor type, memory info, hard drive details, price and more. |
247 | 256 |
</DL><p> |
... | ... | |
1854 | 1863 |
</DL><p> |
1855 | 1864 |
<DT><a name="hardware" href="#hardware"><H3 ADD_DATE="1373801712">hardware</H3></a> |
1856 | 1865 |
<DL><p> |
1857 |
<DT><a name="Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4" href="#Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4"><H3 ADD_DATE="1373802092">Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Phenom X4</H3></a> |
|
1858 |
<DD>From experience, the 27-inch iMac's "2.66 GHz Intel Core i5" (System Information.app) is much faster than vegbiendev's 2.44 GHz "AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core" (/proc/cpuinfo). |
|
1859 |
</DD> |
|
1866 |
<DT><a name="SSD vs. HDD" href="#SSD vs. HDD"><H3 ADD_DATE="1406935947">SSD vs. HDD</H3></a> |
|
1860 | 1867 |
<DL><p> |
1861 |
<DT><A HREF="http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-vs-AMD-Phenom-X4-9550" name="http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-vs-AMD-Phenom-X4-9550" ADD_DATE="1373801697" ICON_URI="http://cpuboss.com/images/cpuboss/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://cpuboss.com/images/cpuboss/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550</A><a name="Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550" href="#Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD Phenom X4 9550" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
1862 |
<DD>page's self-description: We put the 3.4 GHz 3570K to the test against the older 2.2 GHz 9550 to find out which you should buy, the Intel or the AMD. |
|
1868 |
<DT><a name="reliability" href="#reliability"><H3 ADD_DATE="1406935954">reliability</H3></a> |
|
1869 |
<DL><p> |
|
1870 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923.html" name="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923.html" ADD_DATE="1406935422" ICON_URI="http://m.bestofmedia.com/i/tomshardware/favicon.png" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://m.bestofmedia.com/i/tomshardware/favicon.png" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? - SSD Reliability: Is Your Data Really Safe?</A><a name="Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? - SSD Reliability: Is Your Data Really Safe?" href="#Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? - SSD Reliability: Is Your Data Really Safe?" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
1871 |
<DD>page's self-description: Does a lack of moving parts translate to higher reliability? That's the assumption many enthusiasts and IT professionals make about SSDs. We go straight to the data centers using these devices, dig into failure rate statistics, and suggest otherwise. |
|
1863 | 1872 |
|
1864 |
"CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570K based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking." |
|
1873 |
"Other failures are electronic in nature. A capacitor or memory IC might go out, taking the SSD with it." |
|
1874 |
|
|
1875 |
"SMART is really optimized to catch mechanical failures. Much of a disk is still electronic, though." |
|
1876 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/01/30/are-ssds-reliable/" name="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/01/30/are-ssds-reliable/" ADD_DATE="1406935844" ICON_URI="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/wp-content/themes/rockpapershotgun2013/images/favicon-new.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/wp-content/themes/rockpapershotgun2013/images/favicon-new.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Week In Tech: Are SSDs Really Reliable? | Rock, Paper, Shotgun</A><a name="Week In Tech: Are SSDs Really Reliable? | Rock, Paper, Shotgun" href="#Week In Tech: Are SSDs Really Reliable? | Rock, Paper, Shotgun" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
1877 |
<DD>page's self-description: Oh hell, it's happened again. But this time it's induced not only frustration but a sudden pang of guilt. Another of my SSDs has gone titsup.com and my |
|
1878 |
|
|
1879 |
"annual failure rates of SSD run around 1.5 per cent with HDDs nearer five per cent. If true, that does rather blow SSD reliability concerns out of the water." |
|
1880 |
|
|
1881 |
"SSDs don’t take kindly to 24/7 torrenting" ie. they wear out due to use, rather than time |
|
1882 |
|
|
1883 |
"According to a 500TB workload test, even the worst performing SDD tested should survive* for 10 years being hammered with 140GB of “torrenting” each day." |
|
1884 |
|
|
1885 |
"the S830′s have been hammered fairly hard daily for at least two years, including with torrents. |
|
1886 |
|
|
1887 |
Over the same period I have had 4 HDD’s fail (half my total number)." |
|
1888 |
|
|
1889 |
"don’t *rely* on your SSD lasting more than, say, 2 years. Sure, you might be able to use it longer for the performance and responsiveness, but make damn sure you have a backup at that point." |
|
1890 |
|
|
1891 |
"Perhaps it is because more HDDs are dead on arrival, but if it’s not defective out of the box, it’ll last for a decade, where SSD’s generally work out of the box, and generally fail after 1-3 years" |
|
1892 |
|
|
1893 |
"Websites like xtremehardware tested models like Samsung’s 830 by writing data at maximum speed until they failed, which they did after more than a year of constant stress and reaching more than a Petabyte of written data. |
|
1894 |
Without any moving parts or other classic wear-and-tear points of potential failure, that’s many years of use even for power users." |
|
1895 |
|
|
1896 |
"My experience isn’t really their unreliability per-se – it’s that you almost never get any warning before they fail and they always fail bigstyle. |
|
1897 |
|
|
1898 |
HDDs usually [but often don't] give some warning of their impending failure and will often still be semi-readable even then." |
|
1899 |
|
|
1900 |
"I’ve had two HDDs fail (on separate occasions) and they both went down without any SMART warnings or earlier problems. [...] The one SSD I had fail gave a SMART warning on boot and died on the same boot, so that wasn’t very useful, either." |
|
1901 |
|
|
1902 |
"Cloud back ups aren’t really in reach for most of the planet except for negligible stuff like documents. The stuff people really want back after a failure (ie…everything just the way it was) is not feasible to be backed up on a regular basis." |
|
1903 |
|
|
1904 |
"at the same time my main hard drive blew up and then the backup drive died immediately after restoring it, so I couldn’t rightly suggest that HDDs are more reliable" |
|
1905 |
</DL><p> |
|
1865 | 1906 |
</DL><p> |
1866 | 1907 |
<DT><A HREF="http://store.apple.com/us/question/answers/product/MC380LL/A/does-the-magic-trackpad-work-better-than-the-magic-mouse/Q2YFDHCHJAPYHPTU9" name="http://store.apple.com/us/question/answers/product/MC380LL/A/does-the-magic-trackpad-work-better-than-the-magic-mouse/Q2YFDHCHJAPYHPTU9" ADD_DATE="1397105468" ICON_URI="http://store.apple.com/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://store.apple.com/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Does the magic trackpad work better than the magic mouse? - Apple Store (U.S.)</A><a name="Does the magic trackpad work better than the magic mouse? - Apple Store (U.S.)" href="#Does the magic trackpad work better than the magic mouse? - Apple Store (U.S.)" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
1867 | 1908 |
<DD>page's self-description: Well, for me personally, I never unpacked my Magic Mouse after working with my Magic Trackpad for a few hours. However, that's subjective and merely my own opinion. I have read that some people like to use both, depending on what they do on their Mac's. Battery life is also not that great with the Trackpad. I purchased the Apple battery charg... |
1868 | 1909 |
|
1869 | 1910 |
"The problem with the trackpad is that you can't touch it, unless you want the mouse to move. You end up with your hand poised in the air above the trackpad - which as already tilted up - and this is actually much worse ergonomically than a mouse where your hand can rest on the mouse" |
1870 | 1911 |
this is less true for a laptop trackpad because you can move your fingers to the side more easily |
1912 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.macworld.com/article/2039427/how-fast-is-usb-3-0-really-.html" name="http://www.macworld.com/article/2039427/how-fast-is-usb-3-0-really-.html" ADD_DATE="1406895986" ICON_URI="http://www.macworld.com/www.idgcsmb.mw/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.macworld.com/www.idgcsmb.mw/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>How fast is USB 3.0 really? | Macworld</A><a name="How fast is USB 3.0 really? | Macworld" href="#How fast is USB 3.0 really? | Macworld" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
1913 |
<DD>page's self-description: Now that USB 3.0 is found on (almost) every new Mac, the Macworld Lab decided to put its real-world speed to the test, especially compared with FireWire 800 and Thunderbolt. |
|
1871 | 1914 |
<DT><A HREF="http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wirelessinternet/g/bldef_wimax.htm" name="http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wirelessinternet/g/bldef_wimax.htm" ADD_DATE="1394237214" ICON_URI="http://0.tqn.com/f/a.ico" LAST_CHARSET="windows-1252"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://0.tqn.com/f/a.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>What Is WiMAX Broadband Wireless Networking?</A><a name="What Is WiMAX Broadband Wireless Networking?" href="#What Is WiMAX Broadband Wireless Networking?" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
1872 | 1915 |
<DD>page's self-description: WiMAX is the industry term for standard network technologies supporting long-distance wireless broadband. The WiMAX standard provides both fixed and mobile wireless connectivity options. |
1873 | 1916 |
<DT><A HREF="http://compnetworking.about.com/cs/wireless80211/a/aa80211standard.htm" name="http://compnetworking.about.com/cs/wireless80211/a/aa80211standard.htm" ADD_DATE="1394237028" ICON_URI="http://0.tqn.com/f/a.ico" LAST_CHARSET="windows-1252"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://0.tqn.com/f/a.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Wireless Standards - 802.11a, 802.11b/g/n and 802.11ac - Which Is Best?</A><a name="Wireless Standards - 802.11a, 802.11b/g/n and 802.11ac - Which Is Best?" href="#Wireless Standards - 802.11a, 802.11b/g/n and 802.11ac - Which Is Best?" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
... | ... | |
2556 | 2599 |
<DD>page's self-description: Explains how to read and setup umask (he file mode creation mask of the current process) for file under Linux operating systems using bash shell. |
2557 | 2600 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.xfree86.org/current/ctlseqs.html" name="http://www.xfree86.org/current/ctlseqs.html" ADD_DATE="1323814009" ICON_URI="http://www.xfree86.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="ISO-8859-1"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.xfree86.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Xterm Control Sequences</A><a name="Xterm Control Sequences" href="#Xterm Control Sequences" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
2558 | 2601 |
</DL><p> |
2559 |
<DT><a name="VirtualBox" href="#VirtualBox"><H3 ADD_DATE="1401316606">VirtualBox</H3></a>
|
|
2602 |
<DT><a name="virtualization" href="#virtualization"><H3 ADD_DATE="1406884466">virtualization</H3></a>
|
|
2560 | 2603 |
<DL><p> |
2561 | 2604 |
<DT><a name="performance" href="#performance"><H3 ADD_DATE="1406878214">performance</H3></a> |
2562 | 2605 |
<DD>virtualization always imposes two kinds of overhead: context-switching and sandboxing (see below). by contrast, a multi-OS bootloader does not impose an overhead because it only provides a hardware compatibility layer, without imposing context-switching or sandboxing. |
... | ... | |
2577 | 2620 |
<DT><A HREF="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=54370" name="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=54370" ADD_DATE="1406878181" ICON_URI="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>virtualbox.org • View topic - Best VirtualBox host</A><a name="virtualbox.org • View topic - Best VirtualBox host" href="#virtualbox.org • View topic - Best VirtualBox host" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
2578 | 2621 |
<DD>"I have previously used virtual box on windows7 running some test computers and on Ubuntu and havent noticed any performance differences on either." |
2579 | 2622 |
</DL><p> |
2623 |
<DT><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_translation" name="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_translation" ADD_DATE="1406885491" ICON_URI="http://bits.wikimedia.org/favicon/wikipedia.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://bits.wikimedia.org/favicon/wikipedia.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Binary translation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</A><a name="Binary translation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="#Binary translation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2624 |
<DT><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware-assisted_virtualization" name="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware-assisted_virtualization" ADD_DATE="1406884215" ICON_URI="http://bits.wikimedia.org/favicon/wikipedia.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://bits.wikimedia.org/favicon/wikipedia.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Hardware-assisted virtualization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</A><a name="Hardware-assisted virtualization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="#Hardware-assisted virtualization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2625 |
<DD>"Paravirtualization is a technique in which the hypervisor provides an API and the OS of the guest virtual machine calls that API, requiring OS modifications." (this is system call forwarding) |
|
2626 |
|
|
2627 |
"Binary translation can incur a large performance overhead in comparison to a virtual machine running on natively virtualized architectures" |
|
2628 |
|
|
2629 |
"VirtualBox, VMware Workstation (for 32-bit guests only), and Microsoft Virtual PC, are well-known commercial implementations of full virtualization." |
|
2580 | 2630 |
<DT><A HREF="http://superuser.com/questions/146623/performance-impact-of-running-linux-in-a-virtual-machine-in-windows" name="http://superuser.com/questions/146623/performance-impact-of-running-linux-in-a-virtual-machine-in-windows" ADD_DATE="1406877775" ICON_URI="http://cdn.sstatic.net/superuser/img/favicon.ico?v=c82914fca0a9" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://cdn.sstatic.net/superuser/img/favicon.ico?v=c82914fca0a9" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Performance impact of running Linux in a virtual machine in Windows? - Super User</A><a name="Performance impact of running Linux in a virtual machine in Windows? - Super User" href="#Performance impact of running Linux in a virtual machine in Windows? - Super User" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
2581 | 2631 |
<DD>"The I/O hit is going to dwarf any CPU hit somewhat" |
2582 | 2632 |
|
... | ... | |
2594 | 2644 |
|
2595 | 2645 |
"The VM host nicely shielded Linux from hardware problems" |
2596 | 2646 |
</DL><p> |
2597 |
<DT><a name="shrinking disk image" href="#shrinking disk image"><H3 ADD_DATE="1402688456">shrinking disk image</H3></a>
|
|
2647 |
<DT><a name="VirtualBox" href="#VirtualBox"><H3 ADD_DATE="1401316606">VirtualBox</H3></a>
|
|
2598 | 2648 |
<DL><p> |
2599 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.maketecheasier.com/shrink-your-virtualbox-vm/" name="http://www.maketecheasier.com/shrink-your-virtualbox-vm/" ADD_DATE="1402687433" ICON_URI="http://www.maketecheasier.com/wp-content/themes/MTE-8/images/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.maketecheasier.com/wp-content/themes/MTE-8/images/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier</A><a name="* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier" href="#* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2600 |
<DD>"this tutorial assumes you are using Ubuntu and is running on ext2/ext3 filesystem. It does not work on ext4" |
|
2649 |
<DT><a name="shrinking disk image" href="#shrinking disk image"><H3 ADD_DATE="1402688456">shrinking disk image</H3></a> |
|
2650 |
<DL><p> |
|
2651 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.maketecheasier.com/shrink-your-virtualbox-vm/" name="http://www.maketecheasier.com/shrink-your-virtualbox-vm/" ADD_DATE="1402687433" ICON_URI="http://www.maketecheasier.com/wp-content/themes/MTE-8/images/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://www.maketecheasier.com/wp-content/themes/MTE-8/images/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier</A><a name="* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier" href="#* How To Shrink Your Virtualbox VM And Free Up Space For Your Hard Disk - Make Tech Easier" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2652 |
<DD>"this tutorial assumes you are using Ubuntu and is running on ext2/ext3 filesystem. It does not work on ext4" |
|
2601 | 2653 |
note that there are other ways to zero out free space that don't require zerofree and ext2/ext3; *however*, these methods typically will create an empty file that fills the apparent disk space, thus stretching out the VM size even farther to the numerical limit |
2602 | 2654 |
|
2603 | 2655 |
"If you are still using the older Virtualbox 2.0.x version, you can easily shrink the hard disk with the following command: |
... | ... | |
2608 | 2660 |
" |
2609 | 2661 |
|
2610 | 2662 |
"clonehd did indeed shrink my image. I would recommend following all of the steps including defragging and zeroing out the empty space to ensure a successful shrink." |
2611 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.thelinuxdaily.com/2010/02/shrinking-a-dynamic-virtualbox-disk-image/" name="http://www.thelinuxdaily.com/2010/02/shrinking-a-dynamic-virtualbox-disk-image/" ADD_DATE="1402688529" ICON_URI="http://thelinuxdaily.com/favicon-tux.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://thelinuxdaily.com/favicon-tux.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily</A><a name="** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily" href="#** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2612 |
<DD>"Keep in mind that zerofree does in fact support ext4 (I think this article [the maketecheasier.com bookmark] is a tiny bit dated, but it’s a great one)." |
|
2663 |
<DT><A HREF="http://www.thelinuxdaily.com/2010/02/shrinking-a-dynamic-virtualbox-disk-image/" name="http://www.thelinuxdaily.com/2010/02/shrinking-a-dynamic-virtualbox-disk-image/" ADD_DATE="1402688529" ICON_URI="http://thelinuxdaily.com/favicon-tux.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://thelinuxdaily.com/favicon-tux.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily</A><a name="** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily" href="#** Shrinking a Dynamic VirtualBox Disk Image | The Linux Daily" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2664 |
<DD>"Keep in mind that zerofree does in fact support ext4 (I think this article [the maketecheasier.com bookmark] is a tiny bit dated, but it’s a great one)." |
|
2665 |
</DL><p> |
|
2666 |
<DT><A HREF="https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12258" name="https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12258" ADD_DATE="1401316517" ICON_URI="https://www.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://www.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>#12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox</A><a name="#12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox" href="##12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2667 |
<DD>"re-install VirtualBox 4.3" |
|
2668 |
<DT><A HREF="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16323" name="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16323" ADD_DATE="1366756968" ICON_URI="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions</A><a name="virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions" href="#virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2613 | 2669 |
</DL><p> |
2614 |
<DT><A HREF="https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12258" name="https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12258" ADD_DATE="1401316517" ICON_URI="https://www.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://www.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>#12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox</A><a name="#12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox" href="##12258 (Failed to load VMMR0.r0 (VERR_SYMBOL_NOT_FOUND)) – Oracle VM VirtualBox" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2615 |
<DD>"re-install VirtualBox 4.3" |
|
2616 |
<DT><A HREF="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16323" name="https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16323" ADD_DATE="1366756968" ICON_URI="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://forums.virtualbox.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions</A><a name="virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions" href="#virtualbox.org • View topic - Shared folder permissions" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
|
2617 | 2670 |
</DL><p> |
2618 | 2671 |
<DT><a name="Windows" href="#Windows"><H3 ADD_DATE="1392882029">Windows</H3></a> |
2619 | 2672 |
<DL><p> |
... | ... | |
3434 | 3487 |
<DT><A HREF="http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-December/014176.html" name="http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-December/014176.html" ADD_DATE="1348715930" ICON_URI="http://lists.samba.org/favicon.ico" LAST_CHARSET="us-ascii"><img width="16" height="16" src="http://lists.samba.org/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>WARNING: <file> failed verification -- update discarded (will try again).</A><a name="WARNING: <file> failed verification -- update discarded (will try again)." href="#WARNING: <file> failed verification -- update discarded (will try again)." style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
3435 | 3488 |
</DL><p> |
3436 | 3489 |
<DT><A HREF="https://www.google.com/search?q=%s" name="https://www.google.com/search?q=%s" ADD_DATE="1318464507" ICON_URI="https://www.google.com/favicon.ico" SHORTCUTURL="g"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://www.google.com/favicon.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Google</A><a name="Google" href="#Google" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
3437 |
<DT><A HREF="https://www.google.com/calendar/render" name="https://www.google.com/calendar/render" ADD_DATE="1318014776" ICON_URI="https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/favicon_v2013_27.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/favicon_v2013_27.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Google Calendar</A><a name="Google Calendar" href="#Google Calendar" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a>
|
|
3490 |
<DT><A HREF="https://www.google.com/calendar/render" name="https://www.google.com/calendar/render" ADD_DATE="1318014776" ICON_URI="https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/favicon_v2013_1.ico" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"><img width="16" height="16" src="https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/favicon_v2013_1.ico" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Google Calendar</A><a name="Google Calendar" href="#Google Calendar" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a>
|
|
3438 | 3491 |
<DT><A HREF="javascript:(function(){var%20ca,cea,cs,df,dfe,i,j,x,y;function%20n(i,what){return%20i+%22%20%22+what+((i==1)?%22%22:%22s%22)}ca=cea=cs=0;df=document.forms;for(i=0;i<df.length;++i){x=df[i];dfe=x.elements;if(x.onsubmit){x.onsubmit=%22%22;++cs;}if(x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++ca;}for(j=0;j<dfe.length;++j){y=dfe[j];if(y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++cea;}}}alert(%22Removed%20autocomplete=off%20from%20%22+n(ca,%22form%22)+%22%20and%20from%20%22+n(cea,%22form%20element%22)+%22,%20and%20removed%20onsubmit%20from%20%22+n(cs,%22form%22)+%22.%20After%20you%20type%20your%20password%20and%20submit%20the%20form,%20the%20browser%20will%20offer%20to%20remember%20your%20password.%22)})();" name="javascript:(function(){var%20ca,cea,cs,df,dfe,i,j,x,y;function%20n(i,what){return%20i+%22%20%22+what+((i==1)?%22%22:%22s%22)}ca=cea=cs=0;df=document.forms;for(i=0;i<df.length;++i){x=df[i];dfe=x.elements;if(x.onsubmit){x.onsubmit=%22%22;++cs;}if(x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){x.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++ca;}for(j=0;j<dfe.length;++j){y=dfe[j];if(y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22]){y.attributes[%22autocomplete%22].value=%22on%22;++cea;}}}alert(%22Removed%20autocomplete=off%20from%20%22+n(ca,%22form%22)+%22%20and%20from%20%22+n(cea,%22form%20element%22)+%22,%20and%20removed%20onsubmit%20from%20%22+n(cs,%22form%22)+%22.%20After%20you%20type%20your%20password%20and%20submit%20the%20form,%20the%20browser%20will%20offer%20to%20remember%20your%20password.%22)})();" ADD_DATE="1318292619" SHORTCUTURL="r"><img width="16" height="16" src="blank.gif" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>remember password</A><a name="remember password" href="#remember password" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
3439 | 3492 |
<HR> <DT><A HREF="place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10" name="place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10" ADD_DATE="1403193938"><img width="16" height="16" src="blank.gif" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Recent Tags</A><a name="Recent Tags" href="#Recent Tags" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
3440 | 3493 |
<DT><A HREF="place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1" name="place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1" ADD_DATE="1403193938"><img width="16" height="16" src="blank.gif" style="margin-right: 0.5em;"/>Recently Bookmarked</A><a name="Recently Bookmarked" href="#Recently Bookmarked" style="margin-left: 0.5em;">¶</a> |
Also available in: Unified diff
web/links/index.htm: updated to Firefox bookmarks: added links for SSD vs. HDD reliability