Revision 1838
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza about 12 years ago
VegX.organisms.full.csv | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 1 |
SALVIAS-CSV,"VegX::[@xmlns:tcs=""http://www.tdwg.org/schemas/tcs/1.01""]/*s/individualOrganismObservation",Comments |
2 | 2 |
no_of_individuals,/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/aggregateOrganismObservation[*ID]/*/aggregateValue/value,"Brad: Incorrect for VegX. This is a count of number of indiiduals for an *aggregate* observation. For VegBank, I'm not sure. Not exactly the same as stemCount. An individual tree could have 3 stems but would still only count as 1. We need to check with Bob on this." |
3 |
orig_species,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,!partyWithRole]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=binom])/tcs:Name/_name/last",Brad: OMIT |
|
4 |
cf_aff,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,!partyWithRole]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=binom])/{fit,tcs:Name/_name/middle}","Brad: Not sure where this goes. Indicator of identification uncertainty. 'cf.'=similar to the species listed, 'aff.'=related to the species list, but not the same. You'll need to check with Bob and with Nick where these go in VegX and VegBank." |
|
5 |
orig_family,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,!partyWithRole]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=fam])/tcs:Name",Brad: OMIT |
|
3 | 6 |
det_type,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=collector]/groupType","Brad: A SALVIAS value referring to the relationship between the voucher specimen and the observation. Affect how the identification of the specimen(latin name) is transferred to the observation. 'direct'=voucher specimen was collected from this same tree; they are one and the same individual. 'indirect'=voucher specimen was collected for a different individual, but the original data provider confirmed that this is the same species. 'default'=basically same as 'indirect'. 'uncollected'=no voucher specimen, data provider asserted that this was the name but was unable to collect. The main different is that with 'direct', 'indirect', and 'default', the scientific name can be updated automatically based on the name attached to the specimen voucher (assuming you have a link to that data, presumably from a herbarium database. Whereas, if det_type='uncollected', the name can never change because there is no specimen." |
4 | 7 |
coll_firstname,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=collector]/partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/individualName/givenName",Brad: See comment above |
5 | 8 |
coll_lastname,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=collector]/partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/individualName/surName","Brad: Correct for VegBank. This is the collector of a separate specimen which vouchers this tree or species. I worry that vouchers are not properly accommodated in VegX. Again, we need to check with Nick." |
... | ... | |
9 | 12 |
family,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=computer]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=fam])/tcs:Name", |
10 | 13 |
genus,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=computer]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=gen])/tcs:Name", |
11 | 14 |
specific_epithet,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=computer]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=sp])/tcs:Name", |
12 |
orig_species,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=identifier]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=binom])/tcs:Name/_name/last",Brad: OMIT |
|
13 |
cf_aff,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=identifier]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=binom])/{fit,tcs:Name/_name/middle}","Brad: Not sure where this goes. Indicator of identification uncertainty. 'cf.'=similar to the species listed, 'aff.'=related to the species list, but not the same. You'll need to check with Bob and with Nick where these go in VegX and VegBank." |
|
14 |
orig_family,"/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept->/*s/taxonDetermination[*ID,partyWithRole/role=identifier]/*s/taxonRelationshipAssertion(/assertion/*ID->/*s/taxonConcept[tcs:Rank/@code=fam])/tcs:Name",Brad: OMIT |
|
15 | 15 |
notes,/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept/note/text, |
16 | 16 |
coll_number,/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept:[partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/organizationName=$/_ignore/inLabel]/voucher/_alt/1,Brad: Incorrect. Map instead as for voucher_string |
17 | 17 |
voucher_string,/*ID->/*s/individualOrganism/*ID->/*s/taxonNameUsageConcept:[partyWithRole/*ID->/parties/party/organizationName=$/_ignore/inLabel]/voucher/_alt/2,"Brad: OMIT. This is the verbatim text, which includes both collectors name and collection number. I would use coll_number, below." |
Also available in: Unified diff
VegX mappings: Changed taxonDetermination of role identifier to instead have explicitly no role, because data providers' VegX files generally do not provide role information and we don't want the default taxonDetermination XPaths to require this