Revision 4781
Added by Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza about 12 years ago
| inputs/SALVIAS-CSV/Organism/map.csv | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 | 38 |
habit,verbatimGrowthForm,,"Brad: This is growth form (tree, shrub, herb, etc.). It is an observation of a trait." |
| 39 | 39 |
no_of_individuals,individualCount,,"Brad: This is a count of number of indiiduals for an *aggregate* observation. For VegBank, I'm not sure. Not exactly the same as stemCount. An individual tree could have 3 stems but would still only count as 1. We need to check with Bob on this." |
| 40 | 40 |
cover_percent,coverPercent,, |
| 41 |
intercept_cm,volumeCanopy,,"Brad: This is an aggregate observation. Used in line-intercept methodology only, describes the point along centerline at which an individual intercepts the center line of the plot. Used to determin relative abundance."
|
|
| 41 |
intercept_cm,intercept_m,,"Brad: This is an aggregate observation. Used in line-intercept methodology only, describes the point along centerline at which an individual intercepts the center line of the plot. Used to determin relative abundance."
|
|
| 42 | 42 |
height_m,height,/_alt/2, |
| 43 | 43 |
ht_first_branch_m,heightFirstBranch,, |
| 44 | 44 |
stem_tag1,tag,/_alt/2,"Brad: Same as tag1 & tag2, but applied to individual stems. I'm still not clear how to distinguish between methods which tag only individuals trees, and those which tag individual stems." |
| inputs/SALVIAS/plotObservations/map.csv | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51 | 51 |
ht_first_branch_m,heightFirstBranch,, |
| 52 | 52 |
NoInd,individualCount,,"Brad: This is a count of number of indiiduals for an *aggregate* observation. For VegBank, I'm not sure. Not exactly the same as stemCount. An individual tree could have 3 stems but would still only count as 1. We need to check with Bob on this." |
| 53 | 53 |
cover_percent,coverPercent,, |
| 54 |
intercept_cm,volumeCanopy,,"Brad: This is an aggregate observation. Used in line-intercept methodology only, describes the point along centerline at which an individual intercepts the center line of the plot. Used to determin relative abundance."
|
|
| 54 |
intercept_cm,intercept_m,,"Brad: This is an aggregate observation. Used in line-intercept methodology only, describes the point along centerline at which an individual intercepts the center line of the plot. Used to determin relative abundance."
|
|
| 55 | 55 |
cfaff,identificationQualifier,,"Brad: Not sure where this goes. Indicator of identification uncertainty. 'cf.'=similar to the species listed, 'aff.'=related to the species list, but not the same. You'll need to check with Bob and with Nick where these go in VegX and VegBank." |
| 56 | 56 |
other_annotations,other_annotations,, |
| 57 | 57 |
morphocf,morphocf,, |
| mappings/VegCore-VegBIEN.csv | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 74 |
individualCount,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/count, |
| 75 | 75 |
coverPercent,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/cover_frac/_pct_to_frac/value, |
| 76 | 76 |
censusNumber,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=aggregateoccurrence,userdefinedname=censusNo]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue", |
| 77 |
volumeCanopy,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/linecover_m,
|
|
| 77 |
intercept_m,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/linecover_m,
|
|
| 78 | 78 |
fieldNotes,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/notes, |
| 79 | 79 |
recordNumber,/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/collectionnumber, |
| 80 | 80 |
sex,"/location/locationevent/taxonoccurrence/aggregateoccurrence/plantobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=plantobservation,userdefinedname=sex]]:[@fkey=tablerecord_id]/definedvalue","Brad: OMIT. Apparently not used by this institution and of uncertain applicability to plants. With other collections, *sometimes* used for phenological information (if specimen in flower, in fruit, sterile, etc.). If so, this is important information we should keep. Bob, Nick, anywhere for phenological information in VB and VX?; Aaron: Keeping it because it's useful for some collections" |
| mappings/for_review/VegCore-VegBIEN.csv | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 74 |
individualCount,//aggregateoccurrence/count, |
| 75 | 75 |
coverPercent,//aggregateoccurrence/cover_frac, |
| 76 | 76 |
censusNumber,"//aggregateoccurrence/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=aggregateoccurrence,userdefinedname=censusNo]]/definedvalue", |
| 77 |
volumeCanopy,//aggregateoccurrence/linecover_m,
|
|
| 77 |
intercept_m,//aggregateoccurrence/linecover_m,
|
|
| 78 | 78 |
fieldNotes,//aggregateoccurrence/notes, |
| 79 | 79 |
recordNumber,//plantobservation/collectionnumber, |
| 80 | 80 |
sex,"//plantobservation/definedvalue[*_id/userdefined[tablename=plantobservation,userdefinedname=sex]]/definedvalue","Brad: OMIT. Apparently not used by this institution and of uncertain applicability to plants. With other collections, *sometimes* used for phenological information (if specimen in flower, in fruit, sterile, etc.). If so, this is important information we should keep. Bob, Nick, anywhere for phenological information in VB and VX?; Aaron: Keeping it because it's useful for some collections" |
Also available in: Unified diff
mappings/VegCore-VegBIEN.csv: Changed volumeCanopy to the more accurate intercept_m. volumeCanopy was the closest equivalent VegX term, but did not really fit line-intercept information, nor did it include units.